CRAG (Corrective Retrieval-Augmented Generation) adds a grading step between retrieval and generation. A small LLM grader evaluates the relevance of each retrieved document, then triggers correction (e.g., web search) or falls back to the LLM's internal knowledge if all documents are deemed irrelevant.
Corrective Retrieval-Augmented Generation (CRAG) introduces a feedback loop into the RAG pipeline. After retrieving documents, a lightweight LLM grader assesses how relevant each document is to the query. If the grader finds sufficient relevant content, generation proceeds normally. If not, CRAG can trigger a correction action: rewriting the query, performing a web search, or using the LLM's parametric knowledge as a fallback. This prevents hallucination when retrieval fails.[reference:8][reference:9]
Rewrite Query: Use an LLM to reformulate the query and re‑retrieve.
Web Search Fallback: Call an external search API (e.g., Tavily, Google) to fetch additional context.
Parametric Knowledge: Rely on the LLM's internal training data when no relevant documents are found.
Confidence Thresholds: Tune grader thresholds to balance precision and recall.
Suppose you need to build a simple Q&A bot with LangChain that uses a vector store. How would you incorporate a grading step to filter retrieved documents before generating the answer?
If the grader incorrectly marks a relevant document as irrelevant, what would the user see, and how could you quickly debug it?
You added a CRAG pipeline to an existing RAG feature, but the latency increased noticeably. Walk me through how you would identify the bottleneck and what trade‑offs you might consider.
During testing you notice that the grader sometimes returns low scores for documents that contain the exact answer phrase. What could cause this, and how would you adjust the prompt or model to fix it?
Explain how you would design a fallback when the grader filters out all retrieved docs—what should the system do next?
Design a scalable CRAG architecture for a product that serves millions of queries per day. Discuss how you would shard the vector store, cache grading results, and handle model serving.
What are the failure modes of the grading component in a distributed LangChain deployment, and how would you mitigate them?
If you need to support multiple languages, how would you extend the grading step without duplicating pipelines?
Your organization wants to migrate from a custom RAG implementation to LangChain with CRAG across several teams. What governance, versioning, and monitoring strategy would you put in place to ensure consistency and reliability?
Discuss the long‑term maintenance implications of embedding a grading LLM in the retrieval pipeline. How would you handle model upgrades, cost management, and data drift?
How would you evaluate whether adding a grading step is worth the added complexity for a legacy knowledge‑base system that already has high answer accuracy?